Why is the release of log4j-scala delayed?

Ralph

> On Feb 27, 2017, at 10:23 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I would really like LOG4J2-1661 and LOG4J2-1690 out in the next release.
> 
> I implemented LOG4J2-1690 only in the new log4j-scala repo since I thought 
> that it would be released as part of 2.8, otherwise I would have put it to 
> the main repo as well. But now releasing of the log4j-scala repo has been 
> delayed and I start to get disappointed.
> 
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 8:32 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Relative symlinks would work for that regardless of version. Option 1 it is, 
> then?
> 
> On 25 February 2017 at 00:22, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com 
> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
> Note that the link in the log4j site can reference a symlink so that the 
> log4j site never has to change when the Scala site is updated.
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Feb 24, 2017, at 11:21 PM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com 
>> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Option 2 makes no sense to me.  I don’t plan on being the release manager 
>> for log4j-scala. In order for me to implement option 2 I would have to 
>> include the log4j-scala site into the log4j release process - as well as 
>> log4j-examples, etc if they move out. That is just not doable. Deploying the 
>> Scala site parallel to log4j makes it much easier to maintain independently 
>> of log4j.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Feb 24, 2017, at 11:15 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The site repository is laid out like this:
>>> 
>>> log4j/2.x/ -(symlink)-> log4j-2.8/
>>> log4j/log4j-2.8/log4j-api/
>>> ...
>>> log4j/2.x/log4j-api-scala_2.11/
>>> 
>>> Option 1 is to put it here instead:
>>> log4j/scala/2.x/log4j-api-scala_2.11/ (or some variant; that's a pretty 
>>> ugly URL honestly)
>>> log4j/2.x/log4j-api-scala_2.11/ -(symlink)-> above directory
>>> 
>>> Option 2 is to commit the scala site where it is now, but you'd have to 
>>> manage it alongside log4j core releases. Option 1 still requires 
>>> maintenance, too.
>>> 
>>> On 25 February 2017 at 00:05, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com 
>>> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
>>> There is a specific location in svn where the site pages have to be 
>>> committed, so I don’t really understand option 1.
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>>> On Feb 24, 2017, at 9:48 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I see two ways of doing that, though:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. Commit the Scala site in a separate directory similar to what I started 
>>>> doing with Log4j Boot. Add redirect pages or rewrite rules via .htaccess 
>>>> if possible to keep links from breaking.
>>>> 2. Commit the Scala site where it would go when creating the main site. 
>>>> Depending on how you update the files in svn for a site update, could this 
>>>> be more annoying to maintain?
>>>> 
>>>> On 24 February 2017 at 22:30, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com 
>>>> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
>>>> From my perspective that doesn’t matter. However, we would really need a 
>>>> Scala site before we can modify the Log4j site, otherwise it will be a 
>>>> dead link.
>>>> 
>>>> All that really needs to happen is the Scala site needs to be checked in 
>>>> adjacent to the Log4j 2 site. Then the Log4j 2 site just has a link to the 
>>>> Scala site from the main menu. The two sites won’t really be “integrated” 
>>>> - they will just have links to each other.
>>>> 
>>>> Ralph
>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 24, 2017, at 5:02 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com 
>>>>> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> It is cosmetic, but we'd also be adding the Scala 2.12 module.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 24 February 2017 at 14:17, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com 
>>>>> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote:
>>>>> I don’t have the numbers but I have a couple of issues that need fixes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The modules stuff doesn’t require a major version bump. It is mostly 
>>>>> cosmetic.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ralph
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Feb 24, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com 
>>>>>> <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think we can do 2.8.1 with our current bug fixes. Moving modules 
>>>>>> around feels like a 2.9 item to me but that's just me. I really like the 
>>>>>> idea of making bug fixes available ASAP. The only issue I see that 
>>>>>> fixing now is the null classloader issue for which we have a patch but 
>>>>>> it does not work for me (see JIRA).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com 
>>>>>> <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> I'm hoping we can get this released soon as we have some bugfixes and 
>>>>>> such ready to go. I also want to move forward with 2.9 changes but don't 
>>>>>> really want to deal with creating a 2.9 branch or forking master into a 
>>>>>> 2.8 branch. Let's go over anything left to do for 2.8.1:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> * Integrated log4j-api-scala website into main site
>>>>>> * Remove scala modules from logging-log4j2 repo
>>>>>> * Release scala modules from logging-log4j-scala repo (presumably 
>>>>>> shortly after releasing 2.8.1 of core?)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I also have ideas on what we can shoot for in 2.9 and beyond, but that's 
>>>>>> for another day. I think getting everything working properly in Java 9 
>>>>>> would be a good thing to start doing soon so we can figure out if our 
>>>>>> APIs will still work properly in the future or if we need to break 
>>>>>> backwards compatibility. Although, multi-jar support could help in 
>>>>>> migrating the API if needed for 9+, though that would be a rather 
>>>>>> unorthodox abuse of the feature.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com <mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com> | 
>>>>>> ggreg...@apache.org  <mailto:ggreg...@apache.org>
>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition 
>>>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1617290459/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1617290459&linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=cadb800f39946ec62ea2b1af9fe6a2b8>
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> <http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a=1617290459>
>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition 
>>>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182021/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182021&linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac902a24de418%22>
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> <http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a=1935182021>
>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action 
>>>>>> <https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182951/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182951&linkCode=%7B%7BlinkCode%7D%7D&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=%7B%7Blink_id%7D%7D%22%3ESpring+Batch+in+Action>
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> <http://ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a=1935182951>
>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>>>>>> <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> 
>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/>
>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com <mailto:boa...@gmail.com>>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  
> 
> Mikael Ståldal
> Senior software developer 
> 
> Magine TV
> mikael.stal...@magine.com <mailto:mikael.stal...@magine.com>    
> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com  
> <http://www.magine.com/>
> 
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. 
> If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not 
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, 
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  
>  

Reply via email to