I see. But couldn't it be a bit confusing for users to have both? On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> I’m not sure I understand the question. Have you looked at the code? The > syslog appender is nothing more than the SocketAppender hardwired to use > one of those two layouts. However, there is nothing preventing someone from > using those Layouts with a different appender. > > Ralph > > > > On Apr 5, 2017, at 3:57 AM, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com> > wrote: > > Why do we have both SyslogAppender and SyslogLayout/RFC5424Layout? > > -- > [image: MagineTV] > > *Mikael Ståldal* > Senior software developer > > *Magine TV* > mikael.stal...@magine.com > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com > > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this > message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply > email. > > > -- [image: MagineTV] *Mikael Ståldal* Senior software developer *Magine TV* mikael.stal...@magine.com Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
