Why? Ralph
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 6:56 AM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: > > I see. But couldn't it be a bit confusing for users to have both? > > On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > I’m not sure I understand the question. Have you looked at the code? The > syslog appender is nothing more than the SocketAppender hardwired to use one > of those two layouts. However, there is nothing preventing someone from using > those Layouts with a different appender. > > Ralph > > > >> On Apr 5, 2017, at 3:57 AM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Why do we have both SyslogAppender and SyslogLayout/RFC5424Layout? >> >> -- >> >> >> Mikael Ståldal >> Senior software developer >> >> Magine TV >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com >> <http://www.magine.com/> >> >> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. >> If you are not the addressee indicated in this message >> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not >> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, >> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. >> > > > > > -- > > > Mikael Ståldal > Senior software developer > > Magine TV > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com > <http://www.magine.com/> > > Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. > If you are not the addressee indicated in this message > (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not > copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, > you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. >
