Anyone have any thoughts on using the JDBC Appender vs. JMS Appender in a
J2EE environment?

Thanks,

Nate

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Ebersole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:01 PM
> To: Log4J Users List
> Subject: Re: Log4J & J2EE - Best Practices
>
>
> I would suggest using the JMS appender.  I use this in my J2EE setup and
> have had no problems.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frissaer, Jeroen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Log4j Mailing List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:25 AM
> Subject: Log4J & J2EE - Best Practices
>
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I'm studying the use of Log4J within a J2EE environment.  More in
> particular
> > a distributed, clustered environment.  Does anyone has some
> best practices
> > to share on the use of Log4J within such an environment.
> >
> > Thanks for your time and have a nice weekend
> > Jeroen
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to