in general, i would say to use the "jms appender" b/c jms/messaging is an asynchronous process and your method calling the logger to log whatever would not have to wait for the logging operation to complete before continuing, which i believe would be the case with a "jdbc appender".
At 09:47 02/06/05 -0400, you wrote: >Anyone have any thoughts on using the JDBC Appender vs. JMS Appender in a >J2EE environment? > >Thanks, > >Nate > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steve Ebersole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:01 PM > > To: Log4J Users List > > Subject: Re: Log4J & J2EE - Best Practices > > > > > > I would suggest using the JMS appender. I use this in my J2EE setup and > > have had no problems. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Frissaer, Jeroen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Log4j Mailing List (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 9:25 AM > > Subject: Log4J & J2EE - Best Practices > > > > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > > > I'm studying the use of Log4J within a J2EE environment. More in > > particular > > > a distributed, clustered environment. Does anyone has some > > best practices > > > to share on the use of Log4J within such an environment. > > > > > > Thanks for your time and have a nice weekend > > > Jeroen > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
