> It was just an idea.

I think it's not a bad idea, but, like all good ideas, it needs a
sponsor to see it through from idea to implementation. You wouldn't be
willing to volunteer, would you?

And what would you suggest about the graffiti?

> On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Jung, Eric (Contractor) wrote:
> 
> >Can Wikis be abused? If someone writes over the documentation with junk, how
> >does one view the real documentation?
> Would it not just be some self regulation.
> 
> Users could add their fancy configfiles or examples.
> I'd see it as an addition to a FAQ.
> 
> But, sure, it would need someone taking care about it.
> One the other hand I could imagine lower traffic on the list.
> 
> regards
> 
> Heinrich
> 
> >
> >From: Ceki G|lc| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> >Who would set it up? Maintain it?
> >
> >At 20:43 08.10.2002 +0200, you wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Michael P. Canzoneri wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hi All,
> >> >
> >> >In an effort to beef up the Log4j site, I am going to compile a number of
> >> >FAQs and some Examples for the site.  The emails have been great and I
> >would
> >> >like to incorporate some of the material into the site.
> >>
> >>What if there would be some Wiki area on the log4j Site?
> >>

-- 
Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to