On Wed, 9 Oct 2002, Joel Rees wrote: >> It was just an idea. > >I think it's not a bad idea, but, like all good ideas, it needs a >sponsor to see it through from idea to implementation. You wouldn't be >willing to volunteer, would you?
Well, that's why I thought about posting this proposal for a day. Actualy I'm managing an open source webserver already and then I have pretty much project work to do as well. (Like we all, I guess) So I'm sorry that I can't volunteer. > >And what would you suggest about the graffiti? What's the purpose of Graffiti? And what's the difference to Wiki? regards Heinrich > >> On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Jung, Eric (Contractor) wrote: >> >> >Can Wikis be abused? If someone writes over the documentation with junk, how >> >does one view the real documentation? >> Would it not just be some self regulation. >> >> Users could add their fancy configfiles or examples. >> I'd see it as an addition to a FAQ. >> >> But, sure, it would need someone taking care about it. >> One the other hand I could imagine lower traffic on the list. >> >> regards >> >> Heinrich >> >> > >> >From: Ceki G|lc| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > >> >Who would set it up? Maintain it? >> > >> >At 20:43 08.10.2002 +0200, you wrote: >> >>Hi, >> >> >> >>On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, Michael P. Canzoneri wrote: >> >> >> >> >Hi All, >> >> > >> >> >In an effort to beef up the Log4j site, I am going to compile a number of >> >> >FAQs and some Examples for the site. The emails have been great and I >> >would >> >> >like to incorporate some of the material into the site. >> >> >> >>What if there would be some Wiki area on the log4j Site? >> >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
