> -----Original Message----- > From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:03 AM > To: Log4J Users List > Subject: RE: Plans for supporting a build in level of "trace" > > > > Howdy, > > >I agree that this debate will carry on forever, because we all work > >differently. I believe having one trace level is good > compromise. The > >way I work is to put debug statements into the code to > decipher what is > >happening in the program flow, but I would love to have a trace level > to > >print out parameter values or variable values. The debug level gets > >extremely verbose when logging out array values etc and all you are > >interested in is program flow. > > Interesting that the above is exactly the opposite of what Jeff's > use-case is: trace for entering/exiting methods, debug for variable > values ;)
Possibly, but the salient point is it is another use-case for having TRACE! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
