> Thanks for the reply. I downloaded and started looking at chainsaw2 this > morning and started to get the feeling the LF5 was now part of it. > Thanks for confirming that.
LF5 is very popular, we would be negligent in not trying to cater for features that people use. If we missed anything, please let us know. > The new chainsaw does look good and seemed stable in my usage this > morning - well done (I did note a few areas that need a little polish to > unlock their true potential and remove some usability wrinkles :). That's great news. Would you be able to articulate any issues you see to this list? You know how it is, sometimes we are so close to it all, we can't see the forest for the trees... > Is there a gestimate of when log4j 1.3 (and chainsaw2) might come out of > alpha/beta? I would say the log4j Alpha release is 'near', and that is about all I could say with any certainty. Lots of test cases and docs to do yet, and for Chainsaw v2, there is still a number of cool features to add yet. cheers, Paul Smith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
