LogFilePatternReceiver uses SimpleDateFormat. If you don't specify a year with SimpleDateFormat, it assumes 1970.
Scott Deboy COMOTIV SYSTEMS 111 SW Columbia Street Ste. 950 Portland, OR 97201 Telephone: 503.224.7496 Cell: 503.997.1367 Fax: 503.222.0185 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.comotivsystems.com -----Original Message----- From: Jacob Kjome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 2/14/2006 10:23 AM To: Log4J Users List Subject: Re: chainsaw timestampFormat and relative dates Ok, I should have verified first. I found out that the config file is specifying a custom date format. Our official config file has the ISO8601 format, but that hadn't been put in place on the appserver. I was just assuming that the ISO8601 format was what I was seeing. Whoops. I thought that would be odd for an ISO format. I suppose there probably isn't a way to specify a relative date where the year is assumed to be the current year and not 1970. If I'm wrong, someone please speak up. Otherwise, I don't think it will be an issue for me any longer anyway. I still am wondering about the SFTP stuff I mentioned, so if anyone has anything to say about that, it would be appreciated. Jake Quoting Jacob Kjome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > We have a log4j configuration with a file appender having the conversion > pattern.... > > %-14d{ISO8601} %-5p %c{3} - %m%n > > This results in lines such as... > > 13/02 14:05:06 DEBUG ui.actions.MyAction - Some message > > > My chainsaw config has the following for timestampFormat... > > dd/MM HH:mm:ss > > This works, as it matches the timestamp provided by the ISO8601 date (at > least > chainsaw seems to accept it as valid). However, it results in the year being > displayed as 1970. > > So, how do I get this to to assume that the unstated year is the current > year, > not 1970? > > Also, unrelated, what version of JSCH do you use when using the sftp:// > protocol > via VFS? I've now been able to connect via ftp:// using my > username/password, > but not via SFTP. I've verified that I can connect via SFTP using FileZilla. > Just wondering if you had any insight? I've also tried this outside of > Chainsaw (using the <vfs:copy> Ant task) and get the same result. Then > again, > I'm using the same versions of VFS and JSCH there as I do in Chainsaw. Just > wondering if there is a magic combination of versions that works? Otherwise, > I > guess I'll take this question to the commons list. > > later, > > Jake > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
