Flume, not Felix. Sent from my iPad
> On May 1, 2014, at 1:28 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Your best bets for this are certainly Felix, JMS, or maybe even Syslog (the > new RFC version) if you've got a server set up for that already. I'm going > to back up Ralph's idea here that Felix really is the best way to go for > this situation. It's one of the primary use cases for Felix (e.g., in EC2, > it's great for centralized logging). > > >> On 1 May 2014 12:54, Evan J <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This is just gone off the tangent line... in a good way though. >> >> We are going to try to push back and redesign the process to just simply >> make use of JMSAppender to put messages on a queue and have JMS clients >> consume them (and ultimately insert the logs into a database -- maybe use >> JSON for messages). The MQ runs within an integration broker, hence an >> initial idea of routing logging SOAP/service calls through the same broker >> that handles/routes other web services. >> >> This whole marshalling and unmarshalling is very inefficient, on top of a >> fact that this proposed logging service is entirely internal to begin with. >> >> >> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected] >>> wrote: >> >>> This thread originally started to ask about logging to a web service >> (that >>> term usually implies SOAP). It seems to have gone off into another >>> direction and I’m not sure if there is still a question here someone >> wants >>> answered. If you are making a proposal for an enhancement to Log4j 2 I >> am >>> not sure what it is. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>> On May 1, 2014, at 8:51 AM, <[email protected]> >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential >>>> I take it we were discussing the possibilities for high speed >> production >>> logging. Previous people have rightly pointed out that a simplistic >>> approach using soap might be ineffecient >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:36 AM >>>> To: Log4J Users List >>>> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender >>>> >>>> Thats fine. I'm just not really sure what the question is any more. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>>> On May 1, 2014, at 8:22 AM, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential >>>>> As I say there are a lot of architectural options. We need to decide >> on >>> one. Having th ability to modify log4j should make whatever architecture >> is >>> chosen cleaner. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Walter >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:16 AM >>>>> To: Log4J Users List >>>>> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender >>>>> >>>>> What you are describing is why I added the integration to Flume. It is >>> very, very good at collecting log events and forwarding them. However, >> you >>> could use a JMS appender to write your events to the MQ queue. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>>> On May 1, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Evan J wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Ralph, >>>>>> >>>>>> All the request and response messages, some header data, with >>>>>> additional information, are placed in an MDC, packaged in an Appender >>>>>> and sent to an MQ queue which, ultimately, makes a call to the >>>>>> service. It's a centralized logging model for all the applications in >>>>>> a cluster. Frankly, I don't like the design nor the setup, but I >> don't >>> make such decisions (or requirements). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A web service to do what? Logging via SOAP would be extremely slow >>>>>>> if every log event is a single request. Can you elaborate on what >>>>>>> you really want to do? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ralph >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:10 PM, Evan J wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for verifying this. I thought I might be missing an obvious, >>>>>>>> and this has already been implemented by at least someone. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Remko Popma >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Evan, no I'm not aware of any appender that logs to a web service. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Evan J >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I searched around, but I could not find an off-the-shelf Appender >>>>>>>>>> that sends logs to a web service. Is there any? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
