This implementation is old and uses JAX-RPC/RMI calls which usually comes up on top of search results for web service appenders. But thanks anyway.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:48 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Dell - Internal Use - Confidential > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-log4j/index.html > > -----Original Message----- > From: Evan J [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 8:29 AM > To: Log4J Users List > Subject: Re: Web Service Appender > > Hi Walter, > > Can you point me to where one can try these freeware web service appenders? > Thanks. > > > On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 8:23 AM, wrote: > > > Dell - Internal Use - Confidential > > I just saying we have the ability to work with log4j directly at this > > point. That should be useful since a custom appender will probably be > > needed for speed reasons, There are appenders for web services already > > written and available as freeware > > > > Thanks > > > > Walter > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:59 AM > > To: Log4J Users List > > Subject: Re: Web Service Appender > > > > This thread originally started to ask about logging to a web service > > (that term usually implies SOAP). It seems to have gone off into > > another direction and I'm not sure if there is still a question here > > someone wants answered. If you are making a proposal for an > > enhancement to Log4j 2 I am not sure what it is. > > > > Ralph > > > > On May 1, 2014, at 8:51 AM, wrote: > > > > > Dell - Internal Use - Confidential > > > I take it we were discussing the possibilities for high speed > > > production logging. Previous people have rightly pointed out that a > > > simplistic approach using soap might be ineffecient > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[email protected]] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:36 AM > > > To: Log4J Users List > > > Subject: Re: Web Service Appender > > > > > > Thats fine. I'm just not really sure what the question is any more. > > > > > > Ralph > > > > > > On May 1, 2014, at 8:22 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > > >> Dell - Internal Use - Confidential > > >> As I say there are a lot of architectural options. We need to > > >> decide on > > one. Having th ability to modify log4j should make whatever > > architecture is chosen cleaner. > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> Walter > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[email protected]] > > >> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 10:16 AM > > >> To: Log4J Users List > > >> Subject: Re: Web Service Appender > > >> > > >> What you are describing is why I added the integration to Flume. It > > >> is > > very, very good at collecting log events and forwarding them. However, > > you could use a JMS appender to write your events to the MQ queue. > > >> > > >> Ralph > > >> > > >> On May 1, 2014, at 7:15 AM, Evan J wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Ralph, > > >>> > > >>> All the request and response messages, some header data, with > > >>> additional information, are placed in an MDC, packaged in an > > >>> Appender and sent to an MQ queue which, ultimately, makes a call > > >>> to the service. It's a centralized logging model for all the > > >>> applications in a cluster. Frankly, I don't like the design nor > > >>> the > > setup, but I don't make such decisions (or requirements). > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> A web service to do what? Logging via SOAP would be extremely > > >>>> slow if every log event is a single request. Can you elaborate on > > >>>> what you really want to do? > > >>>> > > >>>> Ralph > > >>>> > > >>>> On Apr 30, 2014, at 9:10 PM, Evan J wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Thanks for verifying this. I thought I might be missing an > > >>>>> obvious, and this has already been implemented by at least someone. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Remko Popma > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Evan, no I'm not aware of any appender that logs to a web service. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Evan J > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> I searched around, but I could not find an off-the-shelf > > >>>>>>> Appender that sends logs to a web service. Is there any? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>> -- > > >>>> - > > >>>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >>>> [email protected] > > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: > > >>>> [email protected] > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> [email protected] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > >
