You can also use a normal logger in your appender for stuff that will happen at 
runtime. You just have to be aware that if you have things configured 
incorrectly that may result in a loop - at which point Log4j will detect it and 
ignore those logging events.

Ralph

> On Nov 20, 2015, at 10:55 AM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
> 
> We're attempting to capture error, or info, events that our plugins raise.  
> For instance, we wrote a domain sockets appender.  If that domain sockets 
> appender has trouble connecting to the domain socket we'd like to know about 
> it.  In addition, we'd like to know about it centrally so that we don't have 
> to monitor each of the boxes our code is running on.  We therefore have a 
> "logging" appender which writes to an http endpoint.  The log messages our 
> plugins emit will get forwarded to this logging appender (via the 
> configuration) in hopes to get these issues to a central location.  Of course 
> if the http appender has trouble communicating with the http endpoint there's 
> not much we can report on that, though I guess we could write to the 
> StatusLogger at that point.
> 
> I hope I explained it well enough so that you understand what it is we're 
> trying to do.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> 
>> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
>> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:16:17 -0700
>> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>> 
>> What do you mean by “capture the events from our appenders”?  The 
>> StatusLogger is primarily used during configuration or to log errors that 
>> occur in the appender. If you are trying to capture the events being logged 
>> that sounds a bit odd as that is the purpose of an appender.
>> 
>> If you want to capture all the Log4j status logger output you can specify a 
>> destination on the configuration element. The output will then be written to 
>> that location instead of to stdout.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Nov 20, 2015, at 8:01 AM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The code happens to be a log4j2 appender, so it sounds like you're saying 
>>> we should be using the StatusLogger, correct?  The issue is that we want to 
>>> capture the events from our appenders to a central location.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nick
>>> 
>>>> Subject: Re: StatusLogger
>>>> From: ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:01:45 -0700
>>>> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, the StatusLogger is how Log4j logs things that happen within Log4j 
>>>> itself. If you are writing plugins for Log4j those should also use the 
>>>> StatusLogger as they effectively become part of Log4j. If the are regular 
>>>> application code then they should not use the StatusLogger.
>>>> 
>>>> Although the StatusLogger uses the same API as the Log4j API its 
>>>> implementation is quite different and much more limited in what can be 
>>>> done with the output.
>>>> 
>>>> The StatusLogger implementation doesn’t have Appenders. Instead it has 
>>>> StatusListeners that receive the events. The only listeners provided with 
>>>> Log4j are the StatusConsoleListener, which writes events to stdout or a 
>>>> PrintStream, and StatusLoggerAdmin, which makes events available over JMX.
>>>> 
>>>> Ralph
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Nov 19, 2015, at 6:33 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm trying to get information on the StatusLogger.  I've searched and so 
>>>>> far the log4j docs say:
>>>>> 
>>>>> "Records events that occur in the logging system."
>>>>> 
>>>>> There are also a bunch of articles related to people having problems with 
>>>>> the StatusLogger.  I'm just looking to find out what it is.  It appears 
>>>>> it's somewhat of an "internal" logger that log4j (log4j2) uses to log 
>>>>> internal events.  One reason I'm looking into this is because I see some 
>>>>> code in one of our projects in which the class is logging to the 
>>>>> StatusLogger.  I assume we shouldn't be doing this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is the StatusLogger used in log4j2?  In one post I read that the "status" 
>>>>> attribute controls the level.  Can I set the appender for the 
>>>>> StatusLogger?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Nick
>>>>>                                     
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>                                       
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>> 
>                                         



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to