Does ASF have a build server or something that can build, run tests and produce binaries ?
Regards Tasos Vogiatzoglou On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > On 2011-08-17, Tasos Vogiatzoglou wrote: > >> If there is a schedule for 1.2.11 I don't mind a branch after that. If >> there is not a schedule for 1.2.11 or there are resource constraints I >> could certainly help time to drive a good release. > > It depends on how much help we can get, but I'm confident we can release > 1.2.11 in about a month. I might be too optimistic, though. > >> As have been noted in other messages, there is an issue with the >> strong naming of log4net assembly. That prevents lots of people from >> creating their own assembly as there are dependencies that have to be >> recompiled. In my situation e.g. I have windsor IOC (among other >> things) that would take a great effort to build. > > So far consenus seemed to be that we'll release two sets of assemblies, > one signed with the same key as 1.2.10 and one signed with a new key > that is not kept private and will be used for all future releases. > > We may even release a third set of assemblies that isn't strong named at > all. > >> So if what is needed to have stuff merged is resources, I am willing >> to do what is required. > > I'm sure we can use any help we can get. Short term there'll be a > bottle-neck in that only few people actually have write access to svn - > and things will be worse the coming two weeks due to time constraints on > my side (now that I have write access) - but one thing that everybody > can do is review patches. > > I'll post some ideas on how I think we could release 1.2.11 soonish > later today. > > Stefan >
