On 2012-11-28, Dominik Psenner wrote: > *hm* .. using maven 2.2.1 it seems to work flawlessly. At least it does not > produce warnings. ;-) I checked the site and mostly only the dates are > changed now. *yay!*
[Sorry for being almost totally absent, and not only here. Currently I have no idea when this will change.] I'm pretty sure I've been using Maven 2.2.1 when I last ran the site build. > The last problem I have now are the line endings in the generated site. I am > on windows and I suppose the svn expects \n instead of \r\n line endings? native would be fine if it wasn't for some broken maven plugins. The generated docs will hold a mix of \r\n and \n lines - inside the same file. The headers and footers are different from the content. I intended to dig deep enough into maven to figure out who is wrong - but I read enough other lists to know it is a common problem. Back last year I ended up running Ant's fixcrl over the generated site before committing it (which will take ages BTW). Stefan
