So what are you basing your vote on? Gary On Nov 7, 2015 11:00 AM, "Dominik Psenner" <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 > > But i had and wont have the time to check and test the binaries. > On 7 Nov 2015 5:32 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> log4net 1.2.14 RC2 is available for review here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net >> (revision 11058) >> >> Details of changes since 1.2.14 are in the release notes: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html >> >> The tag is here: >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC2 >> (revision 1713091) >> >> Site: >> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/ >> >> Votes, please. This vote will closeno sooner than in 72 hours, 1630 GMT >> 10-Nov 2015 >> >> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >> [ ] +0 OK, but... >> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... >> >> Thanks! >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) >> >> iEYEARECAAYFAlY+J34ACgkQohFa4V9ri3JX/gCeJ9iScg7122RLfbYm0bRbtobZ >> YCgAniv/xdf0Gcu0L0L6RA2gyUXz5Vow >> =R9ss >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >
