I vote yes.
> On Nov 7, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bode...@apache.org> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > log4net 1.2.14 RC2 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net > (revision 11058) > > Details of changes since 1.2.14 are in the release notes: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html > > The tag is here: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC2 > (revision 1713091) > > Site: > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/ > > Votes, please. This vote will closeno sooner than in 72 hours, 1630 GMT > 10-Nov 2015 > > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > Thanks! > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAlY+J34ACgkQohFa4V9ri3JX/gCeJ9iScg7122RLfbYm0bRbtobZ > YCgAniv/xdf0Gcu0L0L6RA2gyUXz5Vow > =R9ss > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
