I can't think of a good reason why someone would want to make WARN more serious than FATAL. Wouldn't that make it difficult for future maintainers?
Perhaps you could write your own Logger implementation and have it internally mix-up values as you see fit: DEBUG -> DEBUG WARN -> INFO ERROR -> WARN FATAL -> ERROR INFO -> FATAL --- Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll clarify my original question: > > Has the configuration of logging Levels ORDER been implemented yet > or is it > still static, i.e. being able to say that the logging level is > VERBOSE, > DEBUG, WARN, ERROR, FATAL, TRACE, INFO rather that what has been > hardcoded > into the log4* system? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ron Grabowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Log4NET User" <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:18 AM > Subject: Re: Configuration of Levels > > > > There has been example code in CVS since January 2004: > > > > http://tinyurl.com/9atgc > > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging-log4net/examples/net/1.0/Extensibility/TraceLogApp/cs/src/TraceLogApp.cs?rev=1.3&view=log > > > > I think it was possible with 1.2.0 beta 8 which means its existed > since > > at least 2003. > > > > --- Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Has the configuration of logging Levels been implemented yet? Or > is > >> it still > >> static? > >> > >> > > > > > > > >
