I take it then, the configuration of the order of logging levels, has not
been implemented then?
P.S. Please no more about the ordering, they were examples, not supposed to
be discussion points.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Grabowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4NET User" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 1:27 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration of Levels
The point I was trying to make is that most people consider the word
"fatal" to be more serious than "warn". If you have a fatal
accident...you're dead. Your other emailing detailing the order you
need the log levels to be makes more sense.
--- Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a) That was an example
b) Just because you can not think of a reason to do something, does
not mean
someone else does not have requirements to do just that.
"Mixing" up the values is not a solid solution, it is just a plain
hack.
Not to mention, definetly a nightmare for future maintainers of the
codebase.
This question was asked specifically because Niko, awhile back,
mentioned
that the re-ordering of the logging levels was something that was
being
looked at.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Grabowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Log4NET User" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Configuration of Levels
>I can't think of a good reason why someone would want to make WARN
more
> serious than FATAL. Wouldn't that make it difficult for future
> maintainers?
>
> Perhaps you could write your own Logger implementation and have it
> internally mix-up values as you see fit:
>
> DEBUG -> DEBUG
> WARN -> INFO
> ERROR -> WARN
> FATAL -> ERROR
> INFO -> FATAL
>
> --- Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'll clarify my original question:
>>
>> Has the configuration of logging Levels ORDER been implemented
yet
>> or is it
>> still static, i.e. being able to say that the logging level is
>> VERBOSE,
>> DEBUG, WARN, ERROR, FATAL, TRACE, INFO rather that what has been
>> hardcoded
>> into the log4* system?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ron Grabowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Log4NET User" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2005 11:18 AM
>> Subject: Re: Configuration of Levels
>>
>>
>> > There has been example code in CVS since January 2004:
>> >
>> > http://tinyurl.com/9atgc
>> >
>>
>
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/logging-log4net/examples/net/1.0/Extensibility/TraceLogApp/cs/src/TraceLogApp.cs?rev=1.3&view=log
>> >
>> > I think it was possible with 1.2.0 beta 8 which means its
existed
>> since
>> > at least 2003.
>> >
>> > --- Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Has the configuration of logging Levels been implemented yet?
Or
>> is
>> >> it still
>> >> static?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>
