I think I read somewhere that log4net was a port of log4j 1. "Patches welcome" is my motto :-)
Gary On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote: > Sending to both the log4j and log4net mailing lists. > > I'm curious why log4net is not more similar to log4j(2)? Is it because > there is less development work being done on log4net and log4j had > significant changes in the 2.0 version? Any chance log4net might become > more of a "port" of log4j(2) and thus be more similar? > > Thanks, > Nick > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
