Porting Log4j 2 would be a *huge* job. Would you use a translator of some kind?
Gary On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote: > I was debating offering to help. Not that I wouldn't be interested, just > don't know how much time I could commit. Also, not sure I would be > interested in "patching" log4net. In my mind the best approach would be to > port log4j2. I would like the two to be very similar, down to the level > values, configuration syntax, appenders, filters and extensibility. > > Thanks, > Nick > > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:25:19 -0700 > Subject: Re: Why is log4net not more similar to log4j(2)? > From: garydgreg...@gmail.com > To: log4j-u...@logging.apache.org > CC: log4net-user@logging.apache.org > > I think I read somewhere that log4net was a port of log4j 1. > "Patches welcome" is my motto :-) > Gary > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote: > Sending to both the log4j and log4net mailing lists. > > > > I'm curious why log4net is not more similar to log4j(2)? Is it because > there is less development work being done on log4net and log4j had > significant changes in the 2.0 version? Any chance log4net might become > more of a "port" of log4j(2) and thus be more similar? > > > > Thanks, > > Nick > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
