On Sat, 9 May 2009, Seth Daniel wrote:

> I was hoping for a solution that didn't burn two signals.  I'm already
> using the most obvious signals: HUP, USR1, USR2, KILL, QUIT, etc...
> so I'm not exactly overflowing with extra signals. :o)

I see ... in the next version of Log4perl (1.23), you'll be able to call

     Log::Log4perl::Config->watcher->force_next_check();

instead of using a signal:

     
http://github.com/mschilli/log4perl/commit/6c8609f1ba064d3f781769cb9e1b45638f3daa75

(will probably go out soon).

-- Mike

Mike Schilli
m...@perlmeister.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
log4perl-devel mailing list
log4perl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/log4perl-devel

Reply via email to