On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 04:51:47PM -0700, Mike Schilli wrote:
> On Sat, 9 May 2009, Seth Daniel wrote:
>
>> I was hoping for a solution that didn't burn two signals.  I'm already
>> using the most obvious signals: HUP, USR1, USR2, KILL, QUIT, etc...
>> so I'm not exactly overflowing with extra signals. :o)
>
> I see ... in the next version of Log4perl (1.23), you'll be able to call
>
>     Log::Log4perl::Config->watcher->force_next_check();
>
> instead of using a signal:
>
>     
> http://github.com/mschilli/log4perl/commit/6c8609f1ba064d3f781769cb9e1b45638f3daa75
>
> (will probably go out soon).


That's fantastic.  Thank you Mike.

-- 
seth /\ sethdaniel.org

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
log4perl-devel mailing list
log4perl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/log4perl-devel

Reply via email to