On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Ivan Habunek <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 February 2012 12:33, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Does this mean that we can use git and svn in parallel, or once we >> > switch to >> > git we can no longer use svn? >> >> Good question... but I think moving to git does mean svn is history. >> Looking at CouchDB, which has moved before a while: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/couchdb/ >> It seems they are not using svn for development anymore, just for the >> site. But not sure. i will need to ask. >> >> Is this a blocker for you? >> > > Well, I'm not sure. Considering that I'm not proficient with git, I wouldn't > like to burn my bridges. But moving to git will be a good opportunity to > learn. You learn best when you have no other option. :) What do you think?
In my rock'n'roll days we often said: "No pain, no gain" :-) Thousands other people have managed git, why shouldn't we? But hey, if you don't want to slow down with development we are always free to work with the git mirrors first (and feed our svn with patches) Cheers > > Ivan -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
