Hi Sven, nice to have you aboard.

I don't thing it's a good idea to release a final 3.0 version which
will change a lot in future versions. And if we just tack on
namespaces to current class naming scheme, that would need to be
changed in the future. I think it's worth putting in a little more
effort into a 3.0 release. At the very least, we should fix class
naming so it's e.g. Apache\Log4php\Layouts\PatternLayout instead of
LoggerLayoutPattern.

If we do go down the quick & dirty path (which is tempting, since it's
progress and is within reach), then I would much prefer to call the
result 3.0 alpha 1, and have more iterations before releasing the
final product. We don't need to rush, but we need to break this down
to small steps otherwise we'll get stuck again.

Concerning the 2.x branch, I'd like to keep it active parallel with
3.x. We'd can just copy the current master & develop branches to
master-2.x and develop-2.x (or something similar, don't know if
there's a standard naming scheme for this). This way we can later
release new versions of 2.x if needed.

PSR-2, as you said, is not a problem.

BTW, If my life goes according to plan (which it never does), I might
have more time to work on log4php sometime early next year. Until then
I'll try to invest time into managing the project, and start the work
towards 3.0 with your and others' help.

Regards,
Ivan

On 26 November 2013 09:28, Sven Rautenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry to step right into your discussion.
>
> I'd propose this:
>
> 1. Merge the current three branches somehow into a "current" version and
> release the accumulated fixes as 2.3.1 or 2.4.0 depending on the changes.
>
> 2. Then decide to move on to 3.0 and apply PSR-2 coding style. There is a
> style fixer available from Fabienne Potencier - a one time call&commit
> effort.
>
> 3. Only then I'd go and just add a genuine namespace to all classes without
> any other change.
>
> 4. Now add PSR-3 logger. Probably change the internal levels, too.
>
> 5. Release 3.0. ;)
>
> 6. Only now think about features helping with PSR-3.
>
> This shouldn't take very much time. I'd try to help where I can, but point 1
> is keeping me from having done the rest as a pull request already.
>
>
>
> Ivan Habunek <[email protected]> schrieb:
>>
>> Hi everyone, it's been a while...
>>
>> Dmitriy Ulyanov contacted me and said he's interested in continuing
>> work on log4php. I'd like to continue the discussion here on the
>> mailing list.
>>
>> So, Dmitriy, what approach did you have in mind? For starters, did you
>> plan on working on 3.0 release (a rewrite which would feature
>> namespaces and PSR-3 support), or do you prefer working further on
>> 2.3?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ivan
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Sven Rautenberg

Reply via email to