On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 22:36 +0200, Sami Haahtinen wrote: > On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 12:58 -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote: > > Your log didn't include an example for "temporarily blocked" and > > "multirecipient email", but those were clear enough anyway. I also > > added "please relay via your ISP", which was not covered by your patch. > > > > I was intrigued by your making optional of one space and all of > > client/helo/from/to in the "weighted check" rule. Was that intentional? > > I'm pretty sure there was a reason for that, but it could be that it was > a leftover from some variation of the rule. You can leave it out and > i'll file a new bug if it's required.
Hmm.. after re-reading that all, i was of course referring to the first optional space. The client/helo/... is optional because it's not always included in the "decided action=PREPEND" form. I faintly remember considering using 2 sets of rules for those lines but decided against it for some reason. - S -- Sami Haahtinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Logcheck-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/logcheck-devel
