I was afraid of this. If I make it rhyme and/or have the same number of syllables as the english version it tends to become un-grammatical. *sigh* oh well.
I was wondering if it would be legitimate to say "mu'i mo" as if to say "motivationaly because of ?what-relationship?". I guess not. and I fat-fingered that part, it's supposed to be "go'i mu'i do ____ mi" which I think is still not grammatical for the same reason that you mentioned earlier. So it should be "go'i mu'i lonu do ____ mi" though that sounds a little clunky with the extra sylablles. - Luke Bergen On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Minimiscience <[email protected]>wrote: > de'i li 22 pi'e 02 pi'e 2009 la'o fy. Luke Bergen .fy. cusku zoi > skamyxatra. > > jersi > > jersi > > mi jersi do > .skamyxatra > > You need to separate sentences with "{.i}." > > > mi jersi do mu'i mo > > That should be "{mu'i ma}." "{mo}" is the {selbri} interrogative, while > "{ma}" > is the {sumti} interrogative. > > > goi mu'i do ____ mi > > I'm not sure what you're trying to attach "{goi}" to here (or even if > you're > using it remotely properly), but "{mu'i}," when used as a {sumti tcita}, > must > be followed by a {sumti}, usually one that uses an abstraction. In this > case, > it seems that you want "{mu'i lonu do ____ mi}." > > mu'omi'e .kamymecraijun. > > -- > mi na se finti fi tu'a lo vi munje > > > >
