On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Jorge Llambías <[email protected]> wrote: > It sometimes seems like tenses can do the job of "cu", but they don't always.
OK, my bad. You're saying that "abstractor, bridi, tense, brivla" such as "nu broda ca brode", forms a tanru? I had a similar confusion with "nu broda kei brode", which I overcame only by positively using that form, like "ta nu klama kei prenu", there are some event-of-going type of people. So maybe we could use this form a little so I get used to it? Is this right then: ta nu klama ba prenu -- that's some event-of-going-later type of people over there. dei nu pilno le tarmi ca jufra -- this is an event of using the shape now sentence mi cusku lo pu'u cilre fi la .lojban. pu selsku -- i speak a process of having learned about lojban type of expression Now I get it!? mu'o jbocevni mi'e selkik
