Gerd Kortemeyer <ko...@lite.msu.edu> writes: > 1) We notice that the colorful editor is not used very often. Apart > from the psychedelic colors, why is that? What’s the problem with it?
I don't have much new to add, but to say that I agree with what others, like Doug, have said. That is, I see no major flaws with the colourful editor and I use it occasionally, but only as Doug and Itay described, i.e., almost as documentation or code discovery. I'm glad there is choice, but editing the code directly (outside of the browser) is simply more efficient, for me. That said, eliminating reloads and the ability to collapse sections will be nice. Gerd Kortemeyer <ko...@lite.msu.edu> writes: > 4) Think about the whole workflow of authoring problems: What is > important? What do you need? How can the whole process of authoring be > streamlined? Stefan Dröschler <st.droesch...@ostfalia.de> writes: > ...A cleaned up and well documented language for LON-CAPA resources. Damien Guillaume <dami...@msu.edu> writes: > ...the transformation into XML, with a reference XML schema I share the concerns with having to convert code, but am looking forward to this. I suspect it will make authoring in editors like Emacs easier. Damien Guillaume <dami...@msu.edu> writes: > ...we will keep using Perl 5. This makes me happy. :-) Joseph _______________________________________________ LON-CAPA-users mailing list LON-CAPA-users@mail.lon-capa.org http://mail.lon-capa.org/mailman/listinfo/lon-capa-users
