Michael Stevens wrote: > (pedantry: There *are* applications where bad programming > could kill. I don't think any of us work in them, but I'm > pretty sure they exist.) Look at what Sun says Java is not suitable for to get a short list. IIRC they included stuff such as life support machinery in hospitals, air traffic control, and nuclear reactors. Space Shuttle or manned-space-flight rocket control logic probably should also be bug free. Cheers, Philip
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Struan Donald
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless David Cantrell
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Michael Stevens
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Michael Stevens
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Aaron Trevena
- RE: Bad programming considered harmless Jonathan Peterson
- RE: Bad programming considered harmless Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Philip Newton
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless James Powell
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Paul Makepeace
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Mark Fowler
- Re: Bad programming considered harmless Shevek
- Re: Bad programming considered harmle... Paul Makepeace