> Yes, but *is a security hole, and not a small one*, usually. Yes, if you put the wrong things in there, like locations of files. I guess maybe Matt does this. On the other hand, other things can go in harmlessly, and should, such as the response email address for formmail. As for the security issue, there's no reason why we can't place extra layers of checking in for these values (although of course that may not close all holes). I suppose in extreme cases where the original is a security nightmare, the backward compatability mode should be off by default rather than on by default - but if we don't acheive easy compatability no-one will use the replacements.
- Re: Matt's Scripts Dave Cross
- Re: Matt's Scripts Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Matt's Scripts Jonathan Stowe
- RE: Matt's Scripts Jonathan Peterson
- RE: Matt's Scripts Dave Cross
- RE: Matt's Scripts Jonathan Peterson
- Re: Matt's Scripts Philip Newton
- Re: Matt's Scripts Dave Cross
- Re: Matt's Scripts Matthew Robinson
- Re: Matt's Scripts Dave Cross
- RE: Matt's Scripts Jonathan Peterson
- RE: Matt's Scripts Jonathan Peterson
- RE: Matt's Scripts Matthew Robinson
- RE: Matt's Scripts Chris Devers
- RE: Matt's Scripts Mark Fowler
- RE: Matt's Scripts Lucy McWilliam
- Re: Matt's Scripts Piers Cawley
- Re: Matt's Scripts Matthew Robinson
- re: Matt's Scripts Philip Newton
- Re: Matt's Scripts Redvers Davies
- RE: Matt's Scripts Dave Cross