* at 16/05 15:22 +0100 Simon Cozens said: > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 02:41:58PM +0100, James Powell wrote: > > > You've hit the fundamental problem with XP. Getting anything done > > > requires two programmers to agree on something; this, as everyone > > > knows, is impossible. > > > > No it isn't! > > That's not argument, it's just contradiction! must resist temptation struan
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf de... Philip Newton
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (a... Simon Cozens
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (a... Robin Houston
- RE: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf de... Robert Thompson
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (a... Simon Cozens
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programme... James Powell
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP progr... AEF
- Dell asset numbers .. Robin Szemeti
- Re: Dell asset numbers .. Jonathan Peterson
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP progr... Simon Cozens
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP p... Struan Donald
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP p... Chris Devers
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP p... Leon Brocard
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an... Robert Shiels
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP p... David H. Adler
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf de... Philip Newton
- Re: A look over the shoulder of an XP programmer (auf de... Philip Newton
- Buffy ... Robin Szemeti
- Re: Buffy ... Dean
- Re: Buffy ... Dave Cross