On Wed, 30 May 2001, Simon Wistow wrote:

> Andy Williams wrote:
> >
> > Has any one used this module at all?
>
> How does it match up against tchrist's stuff?
>

All the one's that claimed to be valid from E::V failed chaddr!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] had this result from chaddr:
user: andyw. is good
host: hillway.com is good
address `[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is bad: rfc822 failure

So I guess [EMAIL PROTECTED] is invalid even though it works.... wierd!

Thanks

Andy

Reply via email to