Leo Lapworth wrote:
> 2) Oh, yea, make your designers code and your coders design,
> that'll make for a good site - honest.
Though if the designers have some idea of what is and what isn't
possible/easy to implement, maybe we wouldn't have so many image roll-overs,
blank one-pixel GIFs, tables within tables withing tables, etc.
> 3) "see the web through users' eyes" - easy, they can't all
> see it - does that mean you don't have to do anything ?
"Users will say: I don't have Flash and don't want to download it.
Therefore, I should leave out the Flash bits of the site. Users will say: I
read that JavaScript can expose security holes, so I'll turn it off.
Therefore, I will make all my navigation work without JavaScript turned on."
Sounds like a good idea to me so far.
Cheers,
philip
--
Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All opinions are my own, not my employer's.
If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
