On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, anathema wrote: > the hatter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip some of my suggestions, some naughty, some not ] > Would cause *you* to be prosecuted as a hacker. It warms my heart to beleive that abuse@bt would hold me/you/whoever-was-actually-asking in such high regard as to give us special treatment unlike the luser whose machine is causing the grief to begin with, who they were happy to do nothing about. Not that any of my suggestions were actually destructive. However, if there is anyone on here who would do what I tell them, without considering the consequences for themself, please mail me as I'm sure I could find a use for you. Which isn't to say that I'd be too surprised to see "clueful internet user given 25 years for telling user they've got security problems, using security problems" on the reg one day. the hatter
