On 2 Sep 2003 at 9:19, Chris Devers wrote: > On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Philip Newton wrote: > > > No idea what ARJ is doing these days. They still seem to be around > > as a company (and have a better format called JAR, apparently) [...] > > JAR? No relation to the Java archive format, is there?
Correct: no relation. > I thought that Java's JAR files were just Java-tARballs. I believe they're basically ZIP files with certain specifically-named members. Or something. But based on ZIP, not TAR. Cheers, Philip -- Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
