Paul,
Thanks for sending me the By-laws/Constitution information.  I  hope this is going to 
the right place. I�m pretty inept when it comes to e-mail and chat rooms. If I�ve sent 
this to the wrong address, can you tell me how to post to the list?

Comments about eligibility of candidates and board members.  

I agree that all candidates should be registered and dues paying members.  There is a 
certain amount of loyalty that comes from putting your money where your mouth here, so 
to speak.  As far as how long they have been with the party, that�s subjective.  
Someone may have been a member for years and still not understand the basic 
philosophy.  Another person may grasp the ideals in a very brief time.  I would much 
rather see a candidate demonstrate proof of understanding than to arbitrarily set a 
time limit.  How to test a candidates knowledge is pretty subjective too  Maybe that 
is the purpose of the pledge.  Not that they should have to sign it, but that they can 
explain what it means and how it effects the decision they will be making in office.  
I rather like that you put the pledge into your own words.  That means you own it.  
Anyone can put their name on a sentence that someone else wrote, but it takes 
understanding to re-write it.

I�m not sure if this is where I should respond to the subject of NOTA  I�ll be brief.  
I�m not sure I understand what you mean by NOTA is final.  According to my 
understanding of the current by-laws, a candidate must get 51% or more of the vote in 
order to be placed on the ballot by the State Party. In the case where 3 candidates 
each receive less than 50% there will be a run-off election. Since NOTA is always on 
the ballot, the run off is between the 2 highest vote getters and NOTA. If neither of 
these candidates secure more than 51% of the vote, the top vote getter and NOTA will 
run off. If NOTA receives more than 51% of the vote, we will place no one on the 
ballot.

This is where we may run into trouble with 1142. Since the new law requires only 30% 
of the Party�s approval, we run the risk of not giving NOTA a fair chance.

Thanks for all your hard work on this.
Michele P. 



Reply via email to