Ted, since everyone else decided to jump on the "vi" thread, I'll answer this one...
I find that Upstart isn't used that much, it's good to be "aware" of it, like the objectives say, but in the SysVinit/systemd/Upstart war, Upstart is mostly 3rd. I did a lot of reading and experimentation with Upstart for the new version of my book, as well as systemd, and personally, I prefer SysVinit or systemd, they are similar enough and systemd is *somewhat* compatible, both in process and some commands that I can map ok between them. Upstart just seems to me like "52-card pickup with system services"... Ross On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Ted Jordan, JordanTeam Learning LLC < [email protected]> wrote: > i notice the new objectives have systemd added > > just curious why upstartd is not. Not that I am a fan of > either, just curious > > thanx > > ted jordan, principal [email protected] > JordanTeam Learning LLC > Making the World Computer Smarter > > To be more responsive to clients email is read ONCE > in the AFTERNOON ONLY Monday - Friday > Please CALL to reach otherwise > > 216 926 3905 direct > 800 Main Street, PMB 124 Holden, MA 01520 > [email protected] USA > > > On 8/20/2014 7:04 PM, Alessandro Selli wrote: > > Looks like the Linux Foundation now ranks as a competitor of LPI: > > > > http://training.linuxfoundation.org/certification > > > > About Linux Foundation Linux Certification > > > > Linux Foundation certifications give you the a way to differentiate > > yourself in a job market that's hungry for your skills. We've taken a > > new, innovative approach to Linux certification that allows you to > > showcase your skills in a way that other sysadmins will respect and > > employers will trust. Learn More. > > > > They now run two certification programs: the Linux Foundation > > Certified System Administrator (LFCS) and the Linux Foundation > > Certified Engineer (LFCE) ones. > > > > Details on: http://training.linuxfoundation.org/certification/lfcs > > and http://training.linuxfoundation.org/certification/lfce > > > > Let me point this out to you. There is stated the following: > > > > «Certificants who complete the necessary Continuing Education > > requirements on time will have their applicable Certification extended > > for an additional 24 months on the expiration date of their > > Certification.» > > > > [...] > > > > «Approved Continuing Education activities include: > > > > Advanced training courses from The Linux Foundation’s Developer > > and/or Enterprise curriculum (designated with a Linux Foundation > > course code of 300 or higher, e.g. LFD320 or LFS426). > > Approved training from another provider, e.g. from a Linux > > Foundation Authorized Training Partner or from an established Linux > > training provider such as Red Hat, Oracle, IBM, HP, SUSE and other > > similar programs.» > > > > There is no explicit mention of LPI. > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > Alessandro > > _______________________________________________ > > lpi-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss > > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss >
_______________________________________________ lpi-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
