Hi there,

I agree to all of there thoughts, i.e. that re-certification should reflect
continuous education better that it does today. Additional aspects might be
contribution to FOSS projects. We would however have to ensure everything
stays "measurable" and comparable. After all, a certification is about a
defined level of knowledge which somehow must be balanced over all possible
ways to archive and maintain a cert.

Fabian

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Alexandru Ionica <
alexandru.ion...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I also think that continuous education is the better approach but
> eventually you are going to hit a wall with any certification institution
> because they don't have any more certifications available in the path
> you've chosen and you're not interested in alternate tracks they have or
> you have exhausted them all. So then you will look at other
> institutions/vendors/technologies.
>
> Regards.
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:02 PM, G. Matthew Rice <mr...@lpi.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Cleber Paiva de Souza <
>> clebe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Continuous Education seems to me a better approach for certification
>>> holder. That ways while s/he is active in the area their credentials are
>>> maintained active.
>>> Participation in events, conferences, trainings, local Linux community
>>> all could count in the process.
>>>
>>
>> I have to agree there.  I'd add work experience to the mix, too.  By
>> recertifying, you are just confirming that you still know what you knew 2-5
>> years ago.  Continuing Ed and work experience, hopefully, demonstrate that
>> you are broadening your expertise and growing.
>>
>> --matt
>>
>>
>> --
>> G. Matthew Rice <mr...@lpi.org>                         gpg id:
>> 0x17CF9077
>> Executive Director, Linux Professional Institute Inc.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lpi-discuss mailing list
>> lpi-discuss@lpi.org
>> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lpi-discuss mailing list
> lpi-discuss@lpi.org
> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss

Reply via email to