Ted Jordan wrote:

> I just noticed that for the CCNA there is the choice of two exams, or
> one composite exam
> 
> Does LPI have that in their plans for the LPIC 1?

There's nothing to keep anybody from sitting as many LPI exams in a row as the 
test center allows (they may want to close up shop and go home at some point).

I took the LPI-101, -102, and -201 exams one after the other on the same day 
(passed them all, too) and the only reason I didn't take -202 as well was that 
I wanted to read up on it some more.

A composite exam (i.e., 120 question in three hours) would just make the LPI 
exam portfolio more complicated and consume staff and volunteer time not only 
due to the need to add the new exam to VUE and keep the two flavours 
synchronised, but also due to the need to explain to people that there is no 
actual difference between the two separate exams and the combined one as far 
as the subject matter and questions are concerned. (I'm assuming here that the 
composite exam won't offer “LPIC-1 lite” with fewer questions.) This means 
that there would be little to no benefit but considerable additional effort, 
which in a volunteer-driven organisation such as LPI is not a good idea.

In addition, right now candidates are occasionally offered extra time to 
answer some extra questions, in order to bring new questions into the question 
pool. Adding 30 minutes to a 90-minute exam may not be much of an issue with 
most candidates, but adding one hour to a three-hour exam might.

Anselm
(technically no longer with Linup Front – must get that subscription fixed.)
-- 
Anselm Lingnau  …  Linup Front GmbH (MAX21)  … Linux- & Open-Source-Schulungen
anselm.ling...@linupfront.de,   +49(0)6151-9067-0, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de
Robert-Koch-Str. 9, 64331 Weiterstadt  Post: Postf. 100121, 64201 Darmstadt DE
Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705) Geschf: Oliver Michel, Nils Manegold
_______________________________________________
lpi-discuss mailing list
lpi-discuss@lpi.org
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-discuss

Reply via email to