Kenneth Peiruza <[email protected]> wrote: > Longer trainings are harder to sell.
And develop too. Red Hat found that to be the case as well, and started creating more and more 200-level courses, sometimes with exams, that were only 2 days long, especially for new technologies. That way they could reach the market quicker. Of course some eventually became 300 and even 400 level, and a full week with a longer exam, but the 200 allowed them to get out-the-door. > So we have established a common minimal knowledge (i.e. docker and got > essentials) then divided most other topics (jenkins & packer for developers, > k8s and ansible for ops). > I'd suggest dividing LPI DevOps in 1 essential course with this common ground > the. A LPIc DevOps for developers and DevOps for sysadmins. Have you talked to Fabian and Matt about this? If the market is suggesting that model, it would be interesting to visit when the DevOps program is revised in a couple of years. - bjs -- -- Bryan J Smith - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith E-mail: b.j.smith at ieee.org or me at bjsmith.me _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
