Just keep in mind it's an 'Essentials' exam. E.g., When I wrote the Linux Essentials Learning Materials for the Security Objective, I had to pare back 80% of what I wrote on the matter just to not overload the learner, even though it was - - to me - - essential for real world knowledge.
So, case-in-point... what might be ideal in a book, from notes, tips, sidebars, even appendicies, might not be ideal for an 'Essentials' obective, or even the Official Learning Materials either. They are not to even LPIC-1 level. - bjs -- Sent from my Moto G7 Power, apologies for any brevity as well as the satanic versus of autocorrect Bryan J Smith - http://linkedin.com/in/bjsmith On Tue, Mar 10, 2020, 18:29 Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]> wrote: > Fabian Thorns wrote: > > > We tried to avoid frameworks as much as possible since it is complicated > to > > pick the "right" framework and frameworks tend to be changing more than > the > > actual base standards. That's why we tried to focus on core CSS features. > > In that case I still think that requiring people to know about media > queries, > flexboxes, and the details of CSS positioning goes a little beyond “just > enough features to implement a simple sample app”. That stuff tends to > drive > even seasoned web developers to tears, and it's quite a lot of material > for a > weight-2 objective, especially since in actual practice people are likely > to > use a CSS framework after all (as this stuff is simply too painful to use > from > scratch). The same applies to the more obscure CSS selectors. > > > JavaScript is set as *the* frontend > > development language, adding another programming language would certainly > > be beyond an Essentials exam. > > I can sympathise with the “one language” argument, but I'm also pretty > sure > that if I do write a manual about this, at the top of the Express.js > chapter > there will be a very visible warning in large friendly letters saying that > this has been included in the exam strictly for convenience and does not > necessarily represent a good real-world choice. People can make of that > what > they will. > > One wonders why it seems like it's always the terrible languages that > become > popular. (Except for Python, that is.) > > Anselm > -- > Anselm Lingnau · [email protected] · https://www.tuxcademy.org > Freie Schulungsmaterialien für Linux und Open-Source-Software > Free Training Materials for Linux and Open-Source Software > > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
