Nothing could be more false. Sigh... this is the same, wrong answer as when people said systemd was created for notebooks, not servers.
I.e., the priority justification for both NetworkManager and systemd was dynamic, software defined, infrastructure, especially virtual machines and definitely containers. I am sincerely tired of seeing this, because it has been false since the late '00s, and definitely a deacde ago. -- Sent from my phone, apologies for any brevity as well as autocorrect Bryan J Smith - http://linkedin.com/in/bjsmith On Wed, Nov 27, 2024, 09:17 Anselm Lingnau via lpi-examdev < [email protected]> wrote: > Bryan Smith wrote: > > > The static network file/script approach, just like static firewall > > file/script approach, is largely dying or dead because of software > defined > > infrastructure. > > Static files for network configuration will take you a long way if all > you're > doing is instantiating virtual machines cookie-cutter style. Nobody > disagrees > that static files suck for a laptop that you carry from one airport coffee > shop to the next but they do have their uses. Plus, they're conceptionally > easy to understand. > > “Modern” network configuration is unfortunately one of those areas where > the > dust hasn't settled yet and various distributions are all doing their own > thing, for better or worse. It would be nice to see some consolidation > here > but I'm not holding my breath. > > Anselm > -- > Anselm Lingnau · [email protected] · https://www.tuxcademy.org > Freie Schulungsmaterialien für Linux und Open-Source-Software > Free Training Materials for Linux and Open-Source Software > > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] https://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
