On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Chuck Mead wrote:
> It's my opinion that the Level III exams are intended to provide a certification
> avenue for high level Linux folk who want to specialize. For this reason the
> rubber meets the road in *THIS* level
Good point, Chuck.
One of the principle that should guide our planning for L2 is that this is
the last level in which everyone will take the same exams. After L2,
candidates will take only elective exams in specialized area. So any
material that should be known by ALL top level system admins needs to be
included here in L2. In other words, L2 provides the least common
denominator for advanced system administrators.
> I am going to bring it up now... what do folks think about testing xinetd? It is
> much more configurable than wrappers and provides a higher level of security
> when properly implemented!
I doubt it should be included since it is not standard. When we do the job
analysis study, xinetd probably will rate very low because few are using
it. Of course, that may change in the future.
> Perhaps we may want to get into some RAID here... we *are* talking about
> advanced hardware devices here! We should also discuss software RAID as the
> raid1 implementation in the 0.90 raidtools is very nice and quite stable!
I don't know. Perhaps this should be saved for an "advanced system
perfornance enhancement" elective at L3. What do others think?
-Scott
---
Scott Murray, Director of Exam Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux Professional Institute, Inc. http://www.lpi.org
Developing quality professional certification for the Linux community
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
