Hmmm, which RAID, linux or hardware? Nope I don't think we can assume it's
an operational staple on many/most production servers. It might be worth
doing at L3.
Quoting Stephen Holcomb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It seems that because RAID is an operational staple on many/most production
> servers, it is wholly appropriate to the L2 level. Comments?
>
>
> --
> Stephen Holcomb
> Senior Managing Partner - Nexes educational services
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.nexes.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 3:13 PM
> Subject: Re: LPIC-2 Job Description - Review & Comments Requested
>
>
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Chuck Mead wrote:
> >
> > > It's my opinion that the Level III exams are intended to provide a
> certification
> > > avenue for high level Linux folk who want to specialize. For this reason
> the
> > > rubber meets the road in *THIS* level
> >
> > Good point, Chuck.
> >
> > One of the principle that should guide our planning for L2 is that this is
> > the last level in which everyone will take the same exams. After L2,
> > candidates will take only elective exams in specialized area. So any
> > material that should be known by ALL top level system admins needs to be
> > included here in L2. In other words, L2 provides the least common
> > denominator for advanced system administrators.
> >
> > > I am going to bring it up now... what do folks think about testing
> xinetd? It is
> > > much more configurable than wrappers and provides a higher level of
> security
> > > when properly implemented!
> >
> > I doubt it should be included since it is not standard. When we do the job
> > analysis study, xinetd probably will rate very low because few are using
> > it. Of course, that may change in the future.
> >
> > > Perhaps we may want to get into some RAID here... we *are* talking about
> > > advanced hardware devices here! We should also discuss software RAID as
> the
> > > raid1 implementation in the 0.90 raidtools is very nice and quite
> stable!
> >
> > I don't know. Perhaps this should be saved for an "advanced system
> > perfornance enhancement" elective at L3. What do others think?
> >
> > -Scott
> >
> > ---
> > Scott Murray, Director of Exam Development [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Linux Professional Institute, Inc. http://www.lpi.org
> > Developing quality professional certification for the Linux community
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
> > Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > to leave the list.
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
> Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to leave the list.
>
>
--
David Mandala, Senior Executive, Special Projects, Linuxcare, Inc.
415 354-4878 x240 tel, 415 701-7457 fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com/
Linuxcare. At the center of Linux.
--
This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to leave the list.
