Michael Viron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'd have to agree with Chuck on this one -- let me give just a short example to illustrate it: << You've argued - successfully, IMHO - that a Linux-based web application server is cheaper than one based on Windows NT. I'll raise you: it is more stable, too. And has more conceptual integrity, is easier to manage (if done right) and lots of other things that no-one here will dispute - least of all me, as I'm sitting in a room full of Linux servers. But I don't think you've proved that nslookup is a worthless piece of code with no redeeming value. <g> Best, --- Les [http://www.lesbell.com.au] -- This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list. Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to leave the list.
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Pete Durst
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Francois Jeanmougin
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Les Bell
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Chuck Mead
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives David A. Bandel
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Les Bell
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Les Bell
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Chuck Mead
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Michael Viron
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Les Bell
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Les Bell
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives David A. Bandel
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives hunter
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Les Bell
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Les Bell
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives hunter
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Chuck Mead
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Chuck Mead
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives David A. Bandel
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Chuck Mead
- Re: Preliminary DNS Objectives Les Bell
