Look, the point i believe that was trying to be made was, this is a
linux professional certification and to that point we need to keep it on
track and not play these games in regards to windows....lets get on with
the job at hand that needs completed....
i went through this exact same argument and battle when i was working on
the Linux+ certification program for CompTIA, and guess what, bottom
line was that this is a linux certification, and we are not teaching nor
certifying individuals for windows' platforms, thats another realm
altogether. And if a linux professional HAPPENS to work in or be
involved in a cross-platform network/business or need to have a certain
level of expertise in windows, then its up to that individual to worry
about the windows portion of his particular needs. This is not an
all-encompassing certification, this is a linux certification.
--
Les Bell wrote:
>
> hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>
> you are right on target, as always...thank you for reminding us all of
> our frightening past and our seemingly, at times, shaky willingness to
> fully commit.
> <<
>
> I have a client that has over 10,000 Windows machines. Do you seriously
> think that they would accept Linux at all, if the terms were that they had
> to "fully commit" and replace all their Windows machines with Linux?
>
> Best,
>
> --- Les [http://www.lesbell.com.au]
>
> --
> This message was sent from the lpi-examdev mailing list.
> Send `unsubscribe lpi-examdev' in the subject to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> to leave the list.
--
Michael B. Weiner, Linux+, Linux+ SME
Systems Administrator/Partner
The UserFriendly Network (UFN)
--
Linux Registered User #94900 Have you been counted?
http://counter.li.org
PGP: 30 1D CC BA 30 30 63 35 CD 58 E0 89 A9 17 CC C0 8C 55 F7 72
......... Escape the 'Gates' of Hell
`:::' ....... ......
::: * `::. ::'
::: .:: .:.::. .:: .:: `::. :'
::: :: :: :: :: :: :::.
::: .::. .:: ::. `::::. .:' ::.
...:::.....................::' .::::..
--
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
