On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 16:14 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > So for LPI purposes, do we agree that its double the installed RAM? > > Seems like a safe bet :) > > My opinion is thatI don;t like statements like that. In the context of > this > thread, it makes sense because we know the background. But the > statement in > isolation can lead to false assumptions.
And a fair point you bring up > I would prefer to omit this point from any prep materials entirely, > and > definitely remove any exam items that ask this question. Instead > concentrate > on teaching and testing the use of swap space, and how to determine if > what > you have is suitable. It becomes a lot harder with the questions that are multiple choice, no? But I'm sure we can figure something out > My reasoning is that the exam questions must have definitive answers, > and > 2*RAM isn't definitive, atbest it's a vague guideline. Agreed. Maybe we should scour and find out opinions from those that made such decisions - Linus, Rik Van Riel, and so on... Thoughts? -- Colin Charles, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bytebot.net/ "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list lpi-examdev@lpi.org http://list.lpi.org/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
