A mentoring program is a good idea but I'd like to raise a possible issue.
When we take the exams, we must comply with a note of confidence. Will mentors be allowed to talk about the exams? In my personal experience, once you get certified, people begin to ask things about the exams. Mentors should have a clear and concise instructions concerning what they can and can not say about the exams. On 17 May 2007 17:42:10 -0400, G. Matthew Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Etienne Goyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I love it. However: > > > LPI Affiliates > > - possibly receive a portion of the recertification fee. They would > > be doing the audits of experience records locally. This would help > > with ongoing operational costs and additional promotion and support > > in their region. > > If we are to do that, we need to screen Affiliates very carefully. I > would not really trust a third-party to be an objective auditor of my > credentials. But then, we are getting away from discussing the > mentoring idea ... Of course. However, the audit would be mostly calling schools to ensure that courses were taken, contacting mentees (is that a word), getting a reference letter from the employer for professional work claims, etc... I was thinking that the affiliate would more be the gatherer of the information (due to local access) and then forward it to LPI for final say. But you're right, we're not talking about mentoring any more :) Regards, -- g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix care, toronto, ontario, ca phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20 http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
