I agree, there would need to be a strict agreement regarding confidence so as not to water down the validity of the exam information, however I feel that some people would really benefit from a mentor to provide a sense of guidance. So for what it's worth, I do believe, if structured properly, this would be very beneficial.
Matt On 22 May 2007 12:35:38 -0400, G. Matthew Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Marcus Magalhaes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > A mentoring program is a good idea but I'd like to raise a possible issue. > > When we take the exams, we must comply with a note of confidence. Will > mentors be allowed to talk about the exams? In my personal experience, > once you get certified, people begin to ask things about the exams. > > Mentors should have a clear and concise instructions concerning what they > can and can not say about the exams. I'm in total agrement on this point. Nothing will change in this matter if there is a mentoring programme. The idea behind the mentoring (at least for me), although it will encourage people to take the exams, is that people are being mentored to learn Linux. Not to get mentored to pass an exam. Regards, -- g. matthew rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> starnix care, toronto, ontario, ca phone: 647.722.5301 x242 gpg id: EF9AAD20 http://www.starnix.com professional linux services & products _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
-- cheers, matt
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
